土木人

各位土木人版友好：

這是本人的新作<鋼筋混凝土必做50題型>，有意參考者請到各大書局洽詢。感謝您的支持。

本書除了採台灣最新鋼筋混凝土規範編寫外，特別於實力補習班對廣大學員進行了心中理想RC用書的需求調查，本書已經將學員踴躍的意見回饋擇優納入，且為求慎重特別商請三榜首學員 劉冠廷先生仔細評閱本書。許弘相信呈現在讀者眼前這本就是「準備RC考試最好的書！」

本書以題型為經緯，將複雜的鋼筋混凝土內容分成近50個題型，在每個題型下又分成重點整理與解題步驟。重點整理係將該題型的應試重點以白話簡約的方式表達，讓讀者可以迅速掌握應試重點。
而「解題步驟」為本人編寫教材的主要特色，也是實力補習班學員最喜歡的內容。許多學員堅稱即使沒時間讀完本文內容，背好解題步驟就能逐步掌握RC解題的架構。雖然本人覺得學員的反應過於誇大，但解題步驟確實是我最重視的內容。我相信本書對讀者在學校課堂學習上，以及未來參加國考都有莫大助益。





書中亦有許弘老師獨家製作，全台灣最詳盡的鋼筋混凝土統計資料。統計範圍包含：
土木技師、土木檢覈、結構技師、結構檢覈、高考二級、土木高考(高考三級)、普考、三等特考、四等特考、原住民特考、鐵路特考、司法特考、各式升等考、身心障礙特考。
所謂的時間加權是考慮統計範圍由81~104共24年為恐陳舊考題稀釋新近考題的重要性，給予新近考題較高的評比權重，反映最新的考情。

這是其中的普考統計表。

這書必買!!

這本書名看似題解書

實際上卻包含很多詳盡的觀念探討

最值得一提的是

裡面有些跟市面上一般作者不同的見解

並針對一般人易犯的錯誤做深入說明

若先前手邊有其他RC書

也不妨買本來參考、對照看看

前天在書局看到就購入了！

可是中性軸深度偶習慣以X來表示ㄟ...用C感覺怪怪的

Dear Hsu sir:
According to the sample pages of your last released book, it seems that the lengthy formula for evaluating balanced reinforcing steel ratio is still quoted in the book. This formula is hard to memorize, by the way.
With regard to this issue, * of using this ineffectual formula, actually there are some better ways to evaluate balanced reinforcing steel ratio. One of them is using the definition to directly obtain it.
I actually have many laconic and powerful knacks for solving difficult R.C. problems without memorizing any tediously long formula. I am a licensed structure engineer, by the way.
I have never taken your courses, so, maybe you have lots of elegant solutions for difficult R.C. problems, too. Perhaps I will buy one copy of your new book and check it out.
But one thing for certain is that the sample pages provided on this website is not appropriate. Because they can not show how special your new book is, buyers do not have a whole picture about this book after taking a glance at the sample pages either.
From my perspectives, I suggest that you put some more pages which can show the characters of your new book on this website.
Regards

從字面上的意思是說許弘老師寫不好嗎?????

I bought one copy of this book yesterday, and I spent some time taking a glance at all topics included in this book last night.
Some topics are not that bad such as ‘earthquake resistant structures’, but the topics related to flexure loads design (beam members) are too lengthy.
Consider that you are someone who just graduated from college and does not have a sound foundation of this subject, then, this book will actually do a number on you.
This book would be detrimental to your consistent and persistent interest in this subject because some topics of it are written too lengthy yet complicated, and are totally not suitable for the preparation of the exams.
They merely act as frustrations to your passion for this subject.
Speaking of the preparation of the exams, sometimes what you need are just some elegant and efficient solutions for all categories of problems rather than those lengthy yet ineffectual pages or formulas. They just do not help at all.

好深奧的修辭，不過說真的，為什麼不用中文輸入啊 ? 以前我在商業司聘請委員時，一位台大土木的張陸滿教授，每次也都是回我英文，我還以為他在國外，結果他的學生說，老師不會中打，只好回英文，真是太屌了，哈哈哈 ~~~~~